Is There a Price for Being too Nice? Essay

1. Do you deal on that point is a contradiction amid what employers regard in employees ( lovely employees) and what employees in truth do best (dis accordant employees)? Why or wherefore non? I do believe there is a amazing contradiction between what employers boldness for and what employees ar actu e actu tot allyy(prenominal)y unspoiled at. Most employers notion for plenty who be ami open deal who be easily to be c be and pleasing to be near and battalion who ar willing or argon ready to agree or go for actually easily.Agreeable people atomic number 18 more comfortable to create around and be easier to spend a penny with this is why employers choose and manner for pleasing people to hire. I understand why employers prefer to look for people who are more agreeable only when it blades no sense why they would hire people who are not better commerce consummateers and they are little successful in their career. This is why there is a contradicti on people look for a occupation that they are effectual at and a job where they mickle grow and develop their personal and adept skills.The main reason why I believe you pursue a job is because you switch knowledge on it and you would worry to apply your knowledge and grow. Even if youre not an agreeable person, you are truly com handssurate to perform the job with excellence. This contradiction is not hefty at all because employers look for agreeable employees solely what if they are less successful at their job? Being less successful at your job could cost the organization or company a lot of silver and also it could lead to numerous new(prenominal)wise problems such as node servicing or financial matters.On the other hand, what if a disagreeable person knows how to do his or her job efficiently but she doesnt pass water hired because he/she is a little uncomfortable to be around with? As informed in classed, behaviors are influenced by caprices and predilections by feelings. Feelings foot be transmitted to people when they are surrounded by them. They loafer be able to change someones feeling and therefore change their mood and behavior towards their coworkers. This mood, they are less caustic to be around, and they are still solid at job performing. Having this in headway could lead to less contradiction between employers and employees because they faeces hire people who are going to be good at their job and somehow be gentle to be around.Even though it has been proven that people like to have a good relationship with their coworkers and be enculturation at work, it is necessary to have a balance of personalities and propertys in the work environ workforcet. In allege for the organization to succeed or improve, they need employees who are going to work hard and be successful at what they do, but also combine them with agreeable people to backup a twee and comfortable environment for the employees.2. Often, the effects of te mperament depend on the billet. Can you think of some job situation in which agreeableness is an essential virtue? And in which it is defileful? Under sampleful moments or circumstances, agreeableness becomes a virtue when things are going bad at an mightiness or the main vault of a bank doesnt balance at the end of the day. This is a situation where stress hits and your brain stops making sense. Having an agreeable person at that moment helps to consent better the situation, calm down, and try to grade the problem. I was stuck in a very similar situation working in a bank and having money scatty is scary and when you have unpleasant people around you who are not part the situation it becomes even worse.When this happens, you bunk to neglect control, your brain stops making sense, you get mad and it becomes harder to find a solving to the problem. When a more pleasant coworker showed up, she was able to calm down the situation, and change all of our feelings and moods, a nd we were able to find the problem and with-in the solution. Obviously, in these situations the agreeable person was very pregnant to us, and they can also affect many client service work. In customer service the client looks for someone whos going to tolerate them and help them in everything. Agreeable people are wide for customer service they are capable of being passive voice at disagreeable situations and very warm and welcoming to others.They are also pleasant people to have around they help control the mood of the environment and with that help others to be calmer and happier in order to give the customer the best service they can get. As write on the good example, when people are agreeable they tend to not be very good at their job, and they tend to be less success at their careers. They are also characterized for being very passive and easier to manipulate. For people who work on gross revenue, for grammatical case financial institutions administering and buy stocks , this trait is harmful for them. For these types of jobs you need to be belligerent and straight to the point, and unfortunately your coworkers become your enemies because they need you to sell and move fast entirely the opposite from an agreeable person.This trait could harm them in many ways. If they are the sales person, they could lose many customers for the organization and make them lose profit. Also, their coworkers can manipulate them and keep them from selling and they can also get down away their clients. Sometimes being so agreeable can open a door for people to take returns of them or even stepping on them to slip their clients or opportunities. I guess that when the situation requires for you to be aggressive in order to perform your job, being agreeable could be harmful.Also, when your job position is extremely important and you have a high expectancy of the results, being agreeable would be a harmful for you too. It important to have this trait, because this wa y you are able to transmit your good vibe and emotions to the people that surround you, but if youre not able to perform your job then I put one everywheret see the point of having them as part of the organization or corporation.3. In some research weve conducted, weve found that the cast out effects of agreeableness on win is stronger for men than for women (that is, being agreeable hurts mens earning more than womens). Why do you think this might be the case? By nature, men tend to be more aggressive than women, meaning they are more forceful than women. Men tend to attack their clients in a way that they push them into buying their products while women confront the situation by being more sensitive and persuasive. Im guessing that if men are agreeable they lose their hostility and it becomes harder for them to sell their products. I believe that men are characterized for being so aggressive and hot for the things they do that when they become passive, people misconstrue the m which unfortunately leads to them loosing opportunities.On the other hand, women are more passionate but in a sensitive and emotional way. Women have a way to speak to customers that it makes the customer feel safe and not pressured to do anything they perhaps dont want to do. Although that is a good thing for the customers, sometimes that loses opportunities for women in these situations. This, although, doesnt apply to all women or men.There are some women, respectable like men, that have that free edge and aggressive approach and at the end of the day, could save the company in earnings and there are men who have that sensitive and soothing approach. alike previously mentioned, it all depends on the person. On average, yes, men have the advantage over women because they have that aggressive approach and can work themselves out of any situation, good or bad. Women can do the like but in their own peculiar(a) way and at times can make them succeed or fail, just like men.